Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The attitude toward the arts is tragic.  I went to a high school with an arts magnet and I actually was not part of it, although I did take an elective or two and participate in an after school club.  The artsy kids found a creative outlet and they found their people there.  I know it kept some of them on the right path and helped them to succeed academically.  There were also some top across the board academic students in the program.

But honestly…. Those of you who think arts have no value, are you also the people complaining that they don’t teach novels in schools anymore?  Do you think that is somehow different?[/quote]

It's not the purpose of public education for artsy kids to find a creative outlet for their people. What's wrong with you?[/quote]

I get that we are not speaking the same language here, but I thought keeping kids motivated to be successful in school was very much part of the point of public education.[/quote]

Having 6 Art magnet honestly seems like a huge waste of tax payers money and no way you need so many to avoid kids taking wrong path. One should be plenty for county. What next 6 sports magnets? We don't have unlimited resources in county.

Having few Art class as option is very different than making a school Art magnet. That too a brand new school which will take few years for academics to get sorted to start with.[/quote]

+1[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics