Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is no way Jed is going to survive discovery. They're going to tear into his previous clients and astroturfing. Maybe he's looking for a quick settlement.[/quote]

Why would that be relevant? Wouldn’t they be able to figure out what he did or didn’t do re: Blake?[/quote]

Because they can say he has history of astroturfing, therefore get access to his messages/documents with past clients to lay out that history.   That stuff wouldn't be protect. Just like the discovery will extend to Blake's famous friends and her companies, it will extend to Jed's clients. Discovery will be brutal. [/quote]

Astroturfing other people isn’t relevant to the claims here. Jed would fight discovery requests here and I’d be surprised if a judge allows it.[/quote]

It would if they were using it to establish that Nathan and Abel knew Wallace did that kind of work -- it could be used against Nathan and Abel, and potentially Baldoni, if not Wallace.

Which, since they worked for Johnny Depp, might mean subpoenaing any work Wallace might have done for Depp, to establish what Nathan and Abel expected when Wallace was hired.

If Wallace truly did no astroturfing for Baldoni maybe none of this matters. But if it turns out he did any, Nathan/Abel/Baldoni might argue that it was not authorized or not what they expected. Wallace's prior work for their team would then become relevant.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics