Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] If you look at the footprint for even the small Volta pool, concrete deck and pool house, it would eliminate much more than just two tennis courts at Hearst. One of the websites has the footprints superimposed. And that's the footprint for basically the smallest DC pool around. DPR should find some empty property that is not already used for other recreational activities and put a pool there.[/quote] Because DPR has binders full of empty property just lying around in upper NW waiting to have a pool installed on it?[/quote] A big part of the problem is that DPR just does a lousy job managing its portfolio. It has sites like Hearst, Ft. Reno and Palisades that are heavily used, perhaps overused, then it has sites like Hardy and Forest hills that hardly get used at all. Rather than trying to balance the use, they keep trying to cram more and more into the sites that are already the heaviest used.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
