Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Who did you think killed JonBenet?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you know that you did not do a crime, and you get the sense that the PD is looking at you suspiciously as if you were the culprit and trying to get evidence to support that, you would also get a lawyer and stop talking to the PD without a lawyer present, too. I think the Ramseys know they didn't do this. But it's hard to prove you didn't do something when everyone is eyeing you suspiciously and there are a few tidbits of info that look suspicious. I think the burden of proof is not only that the evidence supports the theory, but that other scenarios can also be disproven. That's where the CBS show failed in my opinion. They haven't disproven an intruder scenario. The DNA evidence strongly points to an unknown intruder. Couple that with the later Ninja attack, and I can't rule that out as a reasonable possibility.[/quote] No problem, most people would not do this if their kid had been murdered and they wanted to find out who the killer was. You can get a lawyer and still cooperate. The Ramsey's wouldn't be interviewed by the police for four months. [/quote] That's not true. The Ramseys did cooperate at first. They even took multiple lie detector tests, and passed. But when their friend pointed out to them it looked like the police were looking at them as suspects, they lawyered up.[/quote] They did one interview. The lie detector tests were given by their lawyers,not the police. Are you their publicist?[/quote] No. I don't know them at all and don't have anything to do with this case. Where do you get your inside information from? You don't think there's any reasonable doubt? I do. [/quote] The relevance of reasonable doubt is that it is the governing standard in a criminal trial. There was never a criminal trial. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
