Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The easy way to spot a bot.  They post the same thing over and over.  They have a new talking point each day. Today is perjury day.  I think we are over two dozen non responsive posts.

They also like to report any post that calls out how crazy this appears to Jeff, hoping a new poster doesn’t realize they’ve been saying the same thing over and over for literally pages.[/quote]

Sorry, are you saying this about the pro-lively posts that provide links to the actual court documents? Or the semi-hysterical pro-Baldoni posts that either don’t link anything or link some insane subreddit?

If you are talking about the pro-Lively posts, then I guess all I can say is they are great bots, because they actually sound intelligent. If you are talking about the pro-Baldoni posts, then I agree they seem a lot more bot-like given the hysterics and lack of linking to or referencing court docs. And they definitely shifted me closer to the Lively camp because who wants to be on the side of crazy? 
[/quote]

You mean the WF supporter who posted the link to the Court document, via a reddit link, where Blake admitted that there was no evidence that Flaa acted at the direction of defendants?  The admission that one pro Lively poster vehemently argued didn’t exist until it was posted here? And then she continued to attack Flaa in multiple posts after she was proven wrong.  And you claim the WF supporters are the ones who are crazy?  Ok, then, tells me all I need to know about your logic.[/quote]

That post did not clink a court document. It screenshotted excerpts of a court document, which you misrepresented to be RFAs along with some crazy commentary about the contents and weird emojis.

I don’t know who Flaa is. [/quote]

Yes, I mistakenly copied the body of the post, which I said at the time was unintended.  
You must have missed that as well as  Blake’s allegations about Flaa, the post denying the admission occurred (even though filed days ago), and the multiple posts where Flaa’s career was discussed by posters on both sides.

Or you are gaslighting, as always.
[/quote]

Are you the “WF supporter” you referenced above?[/quote]

Obviously, or I wouldn’t have explained the post.  The only honest poster here.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics