Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Multiple Baldoni defendants have committed perjury, and the Baldoni ass kissers keep coming back with stuff like “oh yeah? But Lively is bossy about selling alcohol!” as if these things are even in the same universe.

Get in, losers, you’re going to … be sorry lol. [/quote]

Lady, you can keep saying this over and over, as you are, but I’m not going to engage with someone who wants to gloss over everything Blake has done.  Not to be mention you sound insane.

It Emds with Courts is the echo chamber you seek.  Have fun[/quote]

You don’t have any real response about the clear perjury from your actual defendants, though. And so you keep ignoring the issue. But it’s a hugely glaring issue signifying that your team is willing to lie under oath. Whereas Lively hasn’t done that at all.

You don’t have any real response so you just keep bringing up the same old BS.  People can see through you.  Just fyi. [/quote]

Lively has done that. That’s the point. She’s also lied to The NY Times and the Court, through fraudulent filings.[/quote]

And to finally put this miserable exchange to death, let me say, I know you don’t believe she has done these things.  But you need to acknowledge others do, just as I can acknowledge that you think Nathan, and for some reason, Wallace, committed perjury, even though I don’t agree with that conclusion.

Further, if you haven’t learned your lesson at this point in the case about forming opinions based on edited texts taken out of context, there is no point in having a discussion.[/quote]

Once again, putting in your court fuling that Baldoni said “smells so good” instead of “smells good” isn’t perjury. Remembering an exchange slightly differently than what actually happened and putting it in your complaint your way isn’t perjury. You’re describing what happened, like the barroom scene, from your perspective and your pov. That’s not perjury.

But all out falsifying facts and saying you didn’t tell your employee to draft defamatory language for a website that you ordered to be created — when your employee says you did order this and moreover has documentary proof of same — that’s not a slightly different remembrance of the facts. That’s perjury.

Perjury is a felony. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics