Reply to Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And the verdict in CW v Read is shameful - I despair for the future of our justice system if crowdsourced innocence fraud campaigns are going to rule the day.

Ah well, I guess it will only be the wealthy whites who get a pass on killing cops and other people, no worries.[/quote]

I knew nothing about this case until this year. The CW did not prove their case, period. [/quote]

Yes they did. [b]Alec Murdaugh was convicted on the same sort of evidence. [/b]

The issue was the noise and distractions caused by the behavior of the Alberts et. al, and Proctor. [/quote]

Alec Murdaugh was convicted on audiotape of him present at the crime scene at a time when he had claimed to be elsewhere and seconds before the shooting. He produced no alternative explanation--not just no credible explanation but no explanation whatsoever--of why he was there, why he had lied about being there, or who else could have shot his wife and son.

One of these things is not like the other. [/quote]

[b]The electronic data is what sealed the deal for Murdaugh.  [/b]

Also, Karen read is on tape saying multiple incriminating statements. [/quote]

No, the actual sound of Murdaugh’s voice in a place and at a time where he had claimed not to be is what sealed the deal on Murdaugh.

Watch the trial footage and you can see it on every face in the room; no interpretation or explanation was required.

Anyway, he’s guilty and she is not.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics