Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My teenager's ECNL team has had 22 on the roster this year, and it's worked out fine - actually, surprisingly well for all players. In the past I've criticized the club for having deep rosters, so I was skeptical at the beginning of the season. I credit the coach's management of the roster. [/quote]

Do the same group of kids not play in league matches (actually not dress, thanks to substitution rules, most wont play in a given match)? Do the kids who don't dress for games think it is working out fine? [/quote][/quote]

All 22 dress, only 18 are actually rostered. If not rostered, they still show up, participate in warm-ups and watch the game; and there's always the possibility of game day substitution (i.e., a rostered player wakes up sick on game day). Of course players are disappointed when they aren't rostered.  But they're free to discuss the reason with the coach, and the coach provides meaningful feedback. Again, it works because of the team chemistry (players evenly matched, for the most part) and the thought the coach puts into selecting game day rosters.  [/quote]

So huge rosters, uncertainty of who the team is per game, disappointed players,  and reduced playing time per player?! And McLean players and families have been ok with this? [/quote]

I don't consider 22 players a "huge" roster for high school players, especially given the potential for injury. Competition is part of life, as are uncertainty and disappointment. There's more to participating in youth soccer, even at the ECNL level, than the number a minutes a  player gets to play per game. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics