Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They can't have it both ways. If the 2009 discussions were binding, they would have required Council approval. So either they're not binding, or they're not valid. Conveniently for Maret, nobody in a policy position at DPR remains from 2009. So everyone just has to take their word for it. [/quote] Maret wants us all to believe that DC having an option to renew the agreement at its sole discretion means, in fact, that DC was obligated to renew the agreement if Maret fulfilled its duties. This repeated over and over in their testimony and appears again in their latest update to their website page on the issue. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
