Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sorry, I did not mean to copy that whole post into this thread. Here’s the link to the post containing images of the actual responses from Lively. https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/s/2qKb9OAkan[/quote] Thank you, yeah, that's not the RFAs it's the statement of facts. I feel like Lively still wants to dispute it, but indeed, there is no evidence. That was weasely of NYT (I have no issue with them quoting the CRD and texts but they really did insinuate Flaa was involved or paid and there just has never been any evidence to support that). [/quote] Flaa has come out and said she had no involvement with Baldoni’s team. Further how would they even know that this interview existed? I don’t think the full video was ever shown back in 2016. In addition to there being no evidence linking them, Do you really think this journalist is lying? She’s had a pretty long career and Blake lively is not her first celebrity rodeo. basically you’re just saying they can’t prove it so the journalist must be lying? Even though we’ve caught Blake in 100 lies. Doesn’t add up. There is no evidence, the journalist denies it, at some point we just have to accept that it went organic on its own because it was a really, really horrible display of celeb behavior.[/quote] Did anyone really think Wallace was lying? Or Melissa Nathan? And yet, signs point to yes, Case's testimony reflects that this whole team is filled with liars. So while Lively may not have definite evidence of Flaa lying yet, I would not in any way be surprised. And if you don't think Nathan and Wallace lied, what is your explanation for Case's testimony that they did, and that Nathan instructed her to write text for the defamatory websites? How do you make that make sense? Please explain that to me, I would love to hear it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics