Reply to Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why wasn’t the house ever part of the investigation????? If someone was found dead on my front yard, I assume the police would like to rule out that it happened in my house. 
[/quote]

Actually, no. If there is not probable cause there will not be a warrant issued to search your house. Especially in this case as JOK was found in the snow with taillights around him and one of the women claiming she hit him. [/quote]

You keep repeating this nonsense. Did anyone actually TRY to get a warrant?? [/quote]

Please speak to any attorney that is willing to discuss this with you. Or better yet reread the constitution and reflect on our basic rights to not be subject to government searches without probable cause.  There was zero basis to get a warrant to search the house. [/quote]

I’m an attorney. You’re clearly a POS who doesn’t care about people’s rights. You’re a thug [/quote]

???? Isn’t caring about rights being scrupulous about not overreaching with warrants??Caselaw to support a warrant in this situation???[/quote]

News flash. They could have gotten a warrant. There was cause.

News flash. Defendants have rights too. Not just cops.

Stop cosplaying someone who knows or cares about rights. You just wanted to see her burn because you think cops should be entitled to do whatever they want.

Like drunk driving around and acting like morons and thugs

[/quote]

You must be a terrible attorney if you think there was probable cause to seek a warrant for that house - there most definitely absolutely WAS NOT, and that is a fact pretty much universally acknowledged by every Commonwealth attorney who has commented on the case.

That said, law enforcement was welcomed into the home by the homeowners minutes after John's body was 'found' (Karen knew exactly where he was, because she hit him and left him there) and LEOs were in the house repeatedly that day. There was zero evidence that anything untoward happened in that house, this is just another red herring of the innocence fraud campaign.

Again, you're a terrible lawyer. I sincerely hope you are not practicing criminal law.[/quote]

You must not be an attorney at all if you think they couldn’t have found PC to search the house. They likely didnt because they were cops and everyone knows it.

In this case:
	•	O’Keefe’s last known location was the house.
	•	He was found mortally injured outside it.
	•	There were people inside who admitted he had planned to visit.
	•	There were inconsistencies and delays in some witness statements.

= PC

Unfortunately they had tunnel vision and focused on karen without actually INVESTIGATING.

You want to be mad, be mad at the CW. [/quote]

What "things to be seized" do you feel the police should have listed in an application for a search warrant?  That is, what things should they have looked for inside that house?  [/quote]

It’s not my job to determine the parameters of a search warrant. Perhaps the investigator should have figured that out instead of texting his friends about her boobs.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics