Reply to If Jesus wasn’t a real historical figure, where did Christian theology come from?

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "If Jesus wasn’t a real historical figure, where did Christian theology come from? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Time to cut through all the trolling about "Bart Ehrman loves Jesus" [b]NOBODY SAID THIS[/b] and "'probably' is the same thing as 'certainly'" [b]THE POINT WAS THAT THEY IS [u]NOT[/u] THE SAME[/b] and "the only evidence is from the gospels but they don't count." [b]CIRCULAR ARGUMENT[/b] How many times can you trolls repeat stuff that's patently untrue?  [b]IT'S TRUE[/b]

For newcomers, here are arguments that thousands of scholars make or agree with when they claim with certainty that Jesus existed. A few pages ago, somebody else put together multiple quotes comparing those who deny Jesus to Holocaust deniers and flat earthers.[b]WE HAVE EVIDENCE OF HOLOCAUST & SPHERICAL EARTH[/b][/quote]

Wow. So many lies packed into one post. Impressive for a Sunday morning. Do you get extra heaven points each time you lie? 
[/quote]

Not lies, just light-hearted characterizations of your silly arguments and obstinate refusal to understand the arguments made for Jesus' existence. [/quote]

Definitely lies.

No one said Bart loves Jesus. 
The point was that probably and certainly are [u]not[/u] the same. 
You can’t use Christian sources to validate Christian sources. 
Nobody has denied he was a man. 
[/quote]

Ah, so we all agree. Jesus existed.[/quote]

As we’ve agreed before: he “most probably” existed. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics