Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well, this is weird.  A cc known as Without a Crystal Ball posted this on instagram today (I don’t know how to link to Instagram but can be found by searching for her handle):

James Vituscka just filed a declaration in court - the declaration is yet another lie told by Vituscka to the court about the details of his communications with Leslie Sloane about Blake Lively.

Vituscka reached out to me in late May 2025. Quickly, James began unloading all kinds of information in my email and DMs which included his emails with attorneys, former employer Daily Mail and the Wayfarer Parties - along with full email strings between Leslie Sloane’s attorneys and his attorneys at Daily Mail.

In his declaration signed today, Vituscka blames Melissa Nathan and Bryan Freedman for misleading the court and for him losing his job.

But Vituscka told Wayfarer in June 2025 that Leslie Sloane is the reason he lost his job and he went as far as to declare that Leslie Sloane & Daily Mail started the smear campaign against Baldoni in August 2024. Vituscka emailed me dozens of emails and correspondence with his editors about the stories they ran in August 2024.

The post includes a photo of an email sent to her by Vituscka.[/quote]

That post is very weird though. It includes what are clearly some emails from JV (with his name and dates on them) which actually back up what he's saying in today's declaration. Then it also contains a bunch of all-caps text (in turquoise highlighter) that has no context but that WACB claims JV sent her, that does in fact make it sound like he totally changed his story. But the all-caps-turquoise-highlighter stuff has no context -- not signed by JV, no time stamps, etc. Plus the style of writing doesn't seem to match the other emails or the other examples we have of JV's writing style (there are tons his texts in the case, in exchanges with Melissa Nathan, Freedman, and Leslie Sloane, and none look like this or have this tone). Also why would JV be info-dumping on WACB at a time when he had already been subpoenaed in this case plus was in the process of lawyering up to take on Daily Mail who had just fired him? No lawyer would approve of that move and I tend to think JV is not that dumb. Also I don't think he'd choose WACB, who doesn't have a great rep for accuracy.

WACB has multiple pending defamation actions against her in unrelated matters. She seems to play very fast and loose with the truth and doesn't appear to vet her sources at all.

I think she either got scammed by someone who convinced her this stuff was written by JV, or she made it up herself. Doesn't mean JV is telling the truth about everything, but like a lot of WACB's "scoops" this sounds too good to be true, so probably is.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics