Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is Wayfarer’s lawyering bad or is the judge just corrupt? [/quote] Maybe both. It was stupid for Wayfarer to write that they didn't pull her address out of thin air and they would be willing to explain, instead of just doing that in their response. But also thought the judge would say her attorney responding to their motion proves she is on notice and she can be served through him. This makes me want to go back and look at all of Lively's motions because I feel like there were others where no one confirmed the person lived at that address, but Liman still granted it.[/quote] Those motions weren't challenged. This motion was challenged. Hey, if those motions had been challenged, I bet you one million dollars that Lively's attorneys wouldn't have responded to the challenge by saying "we promise we didn't pull the addresses out of thin air, let us know later if you want to see our proof" lol.[/quote] But!shit, her attorney has entered an appearance before the Court. This is not a case where poor Isabel didn’t have notice. [/quote] Liman can't make him accept service. If he doesn't want to accept service for Ferrer, that is his prerogative and there is no legal way to compel him to do so.[/quote] Isn't that what this motion was for? Seems more reasonable to serve through her attorney, who is appearing on her behalf, in this very case, than LinkedIn and voicemails.[/quote] But the judge can't force it. It has to do with the attorney-client relationship. A client has to consent to any disclosure by the attorney, so if Ferrer won't grant her attorney permission to disclose, he can't. I know it sounds weird that he can file motions in the case itself but not be told to just accept service, but that's the law. Liman is not permitted to order it, only Ferrer could allow it and she's chosen not to.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics