Reply to Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, it will be developed.  It is zoned r-3, meaning 3 homes per acre.  That's how it should be developed -- as it is zoned. [/quote]

I love the irony of the communities who want this- whose communities [i]would not exist[/i] if  R-3 had been followed for their developments.  Most of the area is R4 or greater already.  Just this one little parcel is R-3.[/quote]

But why have zoning on the books if you aren't going to abide by the designations? I live nearby and I honestly wouldn't ordinarily mind something higher density like town homes but the traffic issues at that intersection are real and significant.  It's one of the main objections to the Sunrise facility. If you don't drive through that area 3 plus times a day at peak hours like I do you don't know the situation. 
[/quote]

Based on the traffic analysis, you'd probably see one extra car at one of your 3 plus visits.

I at least respect the honesty of the folks that simply admit their aversion to an old folks home. But the traffic campaigners either have not actually looked at the traffic analysis or are simply delusional. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics