Reply to Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Falls Church - Say no to Sunrise signs?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Daily traffic, staff, visitors, deliveries, supplies, food, etc and not needed. Other facilities within 3 miles available and not at anywhere near capacity[/quote]

Actually, they are near capacity and one is restricted.  The increase in traffic will be less than the two housing developments that are most vociferously fighting this and far less than the MS and HS cause.  This neighborhood just fights any development on the lot - they have to come to fact that unless they are wiling to purchase the lot themselves, something will be development and horrifying as it may be - there will be change.  Personally, I think  the area need affordable housing and would gladly welcome it on that spot.[/quote]

It's the incremental and total traffic that is relevant here, not the comparative traffic generated by different communities, and in any event others with kids at the MS/HS oppose this as well. You don't seem to speak for anyone other than yourself and Sunrise. [/quote]

I would rather affordable housing not Sunrise. I would rather the site be developed then left in the limbo it has been in for the past 10 years.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics