Reply to Men: Would you date a woman who did not have a "real job"?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Men: Would you date a woman who did not have a "real job"?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
I don't think this is true of most men. I think many professional men want to be with a professional woman even though they might have a more mommy-track professional job that's not quite as demanding as theirs. It's a lot of pressure to be the sole breadwinner even if you're making a ton. Plus I think many ambitious men are attracted to ambitious women and would be much less attracted to someone who is very smart and highly educated  that's content with being a dog walker. [/quote]

Nah. You are projecting your desires onto men.[/quote]

Sounds like it. If ambitious equates to unavailable because of work and/or ball-buster, ambitious isn't even a good thing in a woman I might meet. The smart dog walker looks more attractive. [/quote]

Yikes. Well I'm glad I married my DH and not someone with your attitude. If you have a daughter please don't teach her that ambition is an unattractive quality in a woman. [/quote]

Nothing wrong with it unless she wants to get married and have children.[/quote]

And this is why I'm glad to be high achieving with a competitive job. Trash like the misogynist posting above didn't even come near me when I was single. Less educated women have to deal with such bottomfeeders.[/quote]
Misogynist? You don't even know the definition of the word if you think that misogynist. You Clinton people are unbelievable. You just don't like what being said because it devalues your choices in life.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics