Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Sanders is the real feminist in this race"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Sigh... once again... that was his proposal in 2011. He is now running for president and is creating a childcare program which would benefit the entire country. I posted that piece of legislation only to show that he has, in fact, introduced childcare legislation. [/quote] The point that other posters are making is that legislation is the "start" of leading an effort, but it's only potentially the start. Very often, as I know from being a Hill staffer who crafted and introduced "platform legislation", a bill is crafted and introduced for no other reason than for a Congress member to be able to show they've done something on an issue. The real effort and leadership comes from negotiating with the relevant committee leadership to get the bill taken under consideration and bringing other members on board to vote it out of committee and then onto the floor (these steps are based on House rules, I know the Senate works a little differently, but I think the process is similar). Anyone can introduce a Bill, but from first-hand experience it's a lot of work to make the other stuff happen. Again, though, I don't think anyone (well, not most people) would say Sanders is insincere on the issues. I suspect he very much does care about affordable chilcare and early childhood education...and maybe his ideas are better than HRC's, withholding judgment on that one. But the reality is that being an effective leader, especially in the Executive Branch and especially as the head of the EB, requires building coalitions and compromising. Despite how many people hate and slander Clinton, she has been able to do that. And I think that's important. And I also did work in the Obama WH, so I know how many missed opportunities there were due to his not being able to do that (and also that his selection of Biden as VP was brilliant in that it gave him someone very close who did have that ability). If you disagree with the assessment that this is an important quality in a candidate for POTUS, it would be great to explain why...especially since there are some posters who vehemently argue the opposite, compromise is a huge liability.[/quote] I'm a Sanders supporter and actually think this is a reasonable argument. I think the divergence happens with what people believe Clinton wants versus what Sanders wants, and what's compromise versus sacrifice. To me, the ability to get things done is pretty much a toss up between the two. Much of it depends on the make up of the Congress they're working with and the political capital they get with a won election. These days, that's not much. [b]I just have more trust in what Sanders wants[/b]. [/quote] NP. And that's where I get lost. I have stated so many times that Sanders biggest campaign promise "free college" is really not going to do what he wants it to (close the inequality gap). No one will respond to that issue. I don't think Sanders wants to close the gap - because I think he fully understands the implications of making public colleges tuition free. But everyone is OK with that, and that really bothers me. [/quote] Again, it gets down to what you believe the candidate wants. I've never thought of it merely in terms of "free college" and inequality gap. To me, a prepared workforce just makes sense as a public good and not something that is reserved only for people who can afford it, and [b]definitely not something that hamstrings that workforce with a lifetime worth of debt. Quality is definitely an issue, as it is with k-12, (and healthcare, and any public provision) but I really would like to start with the premise that it's possible to take your education past 12th grade.[/b] I'd also like to see a return to vocational training with investment from the private sector and just making sure there are options for everyone to become a working, taxpaying member of society. The "free college" canard bugs me in the same way that "death tax" and "death panels" did.[/quote] But its a false premise. Because the public colleges will become so competitive that only the top students will be able to get in - making it impossible for those that really need the free tuition to go for free at all, and forcing them to take their chances with expensive private colleges and universities. And students that don't have access already to high quality public schools won't be prepared to go to college, and won't be in a position to compete with the top students for the free tuition spots. The quality of education at the private schools would also diminish (with the exception of the ivy's - they won't struggle at all), and eventually the quality of the public universities and colleges would suffer because they won't be funded properly (one of the reasons tuition has been increasing so much is that they aren't receiving enough funding). I could see myself supporting free vocational training, but I worry that it would become the only option for people from low SES communities, and they would be encouraged even less than they are now to try for "white" collar jobs that require higher education. Regardless, those should not be the "first" steps. They should come after we have already addressed the root causes - a 12th grader coming out of a substandard high school is not qualified for vocational training or college - so that they all do have the option to become a working, taxpaying member of society. We don't disagree on what the end result should be, but there seems to be an expectation that someone at 18 with zero skills can suddenly become a top notch candidate for a competitive university and that's just not true. They need a foundation before they can add the additional education to become competitive job seekers.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics