Reply to First size 16 COVER MODEL of Sports Illustrated!

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "First size 16 COVER MODEL of Sports Illustrated!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]It is SO hypocritical how so many of you are on here blathering about how disgraceful it is that SI photoshopped a (clutching pearls/ GASP!!) size 16 model.  Yet, practically every single size 00 model on practically EVERY single cover has been photoshopped for the exact same reason and no one goes into a tizzy about that.

And on top of that you have some on here shouting down from their soap box about how "if she were a size 12 (or 10 or 14 or 8) it wouldn't celebrate obesity"   at the same time gasping about how she's photoshopped which doesn't make her a size 16, but a size 12 (or 10? o 14?).

So, just so I get this right, summing up what  all of you up there better than the rest of us are saying:

1.  Awful that we're celebrating obesity because she's a fat model on the cover but it would be okay if she were (a bit) skinnier.
2.  But also awful that she's photoshopped to look skinnier than she actually is.
3.  And that how dare ANYONE say that a size 00 is unhealthy JUST by looking at their size.
4. But, JUST by looking at Ashley's size, she is unhealthy because of her size.

Okay.  Got it.   :roll: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics