Reply to Ask me anything: I am a kept woman

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Ask me anything: I am a kept woman"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is his wife a bitch or extremely fat or crazy or an addict or asexual?  Or is she basically normal?[/quote]

The impression I've gotten is that she's high strung and ... doesn't put out. They had big issues with having their second child because she wanted one but didn't want to have sex to "make" him. She is exhausted a lot despite having a full time housekeeper and nanny. [/quote]

He could have broken off the engagement and not had two children with his wife.  It's not her, it's him, pp. [/quote]

Every man who cheat says he has a wife who doesn't put out, is "crazy", is too controlling, blah blah blah.  It's never about the cheating man who is obviously too selfish, immature and cowardly to either end his unhappy relationship before taking up with another woman OR address his marital issues through therapy, etc.  Pathetic.

Incidentally, I don't blame the other woman in these scenarios.  Feel sorry for them to some extent since they usually have issues themselves.  [b]But they didn't take the vow of marriage, the guys did.[/b]  [/quote]

That is true, but since OP is a consenting adult with knowledge of her affair partner's marriage and children, she is undeniably complicit. Blame is not mutually exclusive.[/quote]

Sure, but she doesn't owe anything to her partner's wife and kids.  Sure, it's not morally upstanding to be the other woman. [b] But she's not complicit.  She is a symptom of her partner's dishonesty and selfishness. [/b] [/quote]

She surely is complicit from an ethical perspective, though not a legal one. She's an agent, not a passive "symptom." She can act and stop the relationship should she wish. Legally, she has no obligation to her affair partner's wife or kids, but morally she is culpable. She has chosen with intent, time and time again, to participate in an act that can cause potential harm to innocent bystanders (the children). I agree that the husband has more responsibility in this case, but it is simplistic to the point of inaccuracy to say that the OP has clean hands.[/quote]

I disagree with you and your line of thinking simply props up the absurd notion that the cheater is not absolutely and undenaibly culpable, legally and otherwise.  Again, she didn't take the vows of marriage and fidelity.  I'd feel the same way if the cheater were a woman, by the way.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics