Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]http://www.judicial.state.sc.us/opinions/HTMLFiles/SC/27148.pdf Link to actual cort transcript[/quote] Here's a link to the Supreme Court decision which clearly states how the SC Supreme Court erred http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-399_q86b.pdf . Seems as if the bio father could have adopted the baby after terminating his parental rights and won. Instead, he fucked up by arguing (incorrectly) that his rights couldn't be terminated because he was a member of an Indian tribe. Considering both courts found that he had made no attempt at 'meaningful' contact until 4 months after her birth (and after he signed papers terminating his rights), I'd say the courts made the right decision. What I didn't know, and learned from the decision paper, was that SC and OK law indicate an unwed mother has sole physical and legal custody of a baby until a court determines otherwise.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
