Reply to Natalie Portman is pregnant with baby #3!

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Natalie Portman is pregnant with baby #3!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Michelle Williams welcomed a baby via surrogate last April at 44. This was her 4th. She has 3 children with her new husband (born in 2020, 2022, 2025). She had them at 39 and 42 and used a surrogate at 44.

Her first was with Heath Ledger.[/quote]

An older mom's surrogate baby from someone else's womb and possibly someone else's eggs is not at all the same thing as a woman having a baby in her 40s.

It is akin to adopting a baby.  [b]She did not have a baby in her 40s.  She didn't have a baby.  Someone else had that baby.[/b][/quote]

What part of “she had a baby at 42” did you not understand? That was #3 and wasn’t a surrogate. She most definitely birthed a baby in her 40s. lol.

And why did you have my post removed that previously exposed this? Very odd.[/quote]

This comment was in response to the person tgat posted "Michelle Williams had a baby via surrogate at 44" not Natalie Portman.

Michelle Williams paying another younger woman for her womb and her baby at age 44 is not at all the same as Natalie Portman or any other mom having a baby in their 40s.

Surrogacy in your 40s is more similar to adopting a baby, and not at all the same to having your own baby in your own womb 
[/quote]

DP. Michelle Williams had a baby "in her own womb" at 42. So she had a baby in her 40s.[/quote]

The person wrote

"[i]Michelle Williams welcomed a [u]baby via surrogate [/u]last April at 44.[/i] This was her 4th. She has 3 children with her new husband (born in 2020, 2022, 2025). [size=24]She had them at 39 and 42[/size] and used a [u]surrogate[/u] at 44."

If you scoll up you can see the entire conversation.

[/quote]

I'm not that PP but since when is 42 not "in her 40s?" [/quote]

The post was in response to the surrogacy at 44,  which was the lead and the conclusion of the comment.[/quote]

So you didn’t read the middle of my comment?! I’m very aware that a surrogate is not the same as birthing own baby, but Michelle Williams still birthed her own baby at 42. That counts as having your own baby in your 40s.

Why would you only respond to my factoid that she used a surrogate at 44?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics