Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Talarico or Crockett?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Paxton is such an undemocratic tool. [quote]The process of tallying primary ballots in Texas’ second-most-populous county was thrown into uncertainty on Tuesday evening when the State Supreme Court temporarily blocked an earlier court ruling allowing voters more time to cast ballots. Earlier in the day, a district judge had ordered Dallas County to keep its polling places open to Democrats for an additional two hours, until 9 p.m. local time, over concerns that a rule change about where to vote had caused “mass confusion” among voters weighing in on consequential House and Senate contests. But the Texas Supreme Court, in a ruling just before 8:30 p.m. local time, said that “votes cast by voters who were not in line to vote at 7 p.m. should be separated.” Paul Adams, the Dallas County election administrator, confirmed that the votes would not be counted, and instead segregated the ballots pending further legal challenges. The challenge to the lower court’s ruling came from the office of Ken Paxton, the hard-line state attorney general who is running against Senator John Cornyn in a bitter Republican primary. “We have a duty to make sure the law is followed in Texas,” said Brent Webster, the first assistant attorney general to Mr. Paxton, adding that it was his name rather than Mr. Paxton’s name on the filing “so that there’s no appearance of impropriety.” [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics