Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Liam"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] First of all, no more quotas or bonuses for agents. Secondly, agents need to only detain people when they have a judicial warrant. Keep detainees close to their homes and families. Preserve the consitutional rights of all people (whether citizen or not) and agents need to be investigated and punished if they violate the constitution, same as every other law enforcement officer. [/quote] 1. Agree 2. Maybe 3. Yes, but [b]will you support the construction or expansion of such facilities[/b] in your probably urban/suburban area so that the detainees can be close to their families and legal support? Because many blue states are trying to keep these facilities out. Then the detainees end up in places like Alabama or Lumpkin, GA in the middle of nowhere with little opportunity for legal support. So the libs can pat themselves on the back how they are such good people for not allowing these to be built in their county or state. 4. Agree Furthermore, if all of these are achieved, there will still be some sad situations. Are you gonna be OK with that or should we never deport any noncriminal because it makes people sad?[/quote] If agents just detain people for whom they have a judicial warrant (meaning there is some evidence they should be detained, not just picking people up because they speak with an accent) that should significantly decrease the number of people who need a place in a local detention center. I am very concerned about these privately run detainment centers. I believe there is MASSIVE grift going on. The administration is paying these privately owned detainment centers money each day for the bodies they send to meet their performance quotas. And people are being kept there for a long time, to keep capacity (and thus billing) at its maximum. People are upset about Somalian run daycare centers and federal funding fraud? Please look at the massive grift that is happening with these detainment centers.[/quote] If I came here illegally via southern border crossing undetected, how would ICE know about me to obtain a warrant? If I'm in the car with someone who ICE is after, then I could be detained as well.[/quote] If no one knows about you? That means you aren’t terribly scary or harmful. Deport the actual bad guys. Require documentation of legal status for all federal aid, sure. Investigate anyone applying for federal aid to see if their documentation is up to date and correct. You can even investigate employers to be sure they are correctly screening their employees for permission to work. But stop coming down heavily on random people just to see what you find. [/quote] Some employers are using e-verify and not catching people because they are using stolen IDs. If I am in the car in the above scenario then I should be detained if necessary. Send a clear message that illegal immigration will not be tolerated. What is so difficult about that? Also, know that schools receive federal funding for things such as school lunches. Are you in favor of verifying status to enroll?[/quote] ICE is operating under the quotas imposed by Trump himself. People are not just 'detained'. The agents have incentive to arrest people because that counts for their quota whether they are here illegally or not. People/Americans/immigrants (legal and otherwise) are arrested and sent to facilities/camps and held until they can produce x papers/documents. This is a violation of the fourth amendment and possibly 8th amendment. That is what is 'difficult' about that. The presence of people here illegally does not give the feds the right to violate these rights much less normalize their violation. As for kids getting free food at schools - I will [i]maybe[/i] care about that after Trump and his family and other criminal hanger-ons who are in charge of our country and profiting off of all of us to the tune of billions are GONE and hopefully in prison. [/quote] ^ not to mention ICE agents are wearing masks while 'detaining' people. This is not proper law enforcement protocol. They are operating outside the bounds of legality themselves. Please take the time to read what the judge said in this order releasing Liam: [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HABmFalWIAASSDa?format=jpg&name=large[/img] [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HABmFahXQAAY4Fv?format=jpg&name=large[/img] [img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HABmFauWgAAklD3?format=jpg&name=large[/img] [/quote] Am I seeing what I think I'm seeing? In the signature, a US District Judge, in official documentation, lists bible verses?? Obviously I appreciate this judge's opinion and scathing remarks, but how can you be all for the Constitution on one hand while not understanding the importance of separating church and state on the other? I'm pretty sure quran or torah quotes would not be well received. [/quote] What Bible verses are you seeing?[/quote] Under the picture of Liam it says "Matthew 19:14 and John 11:35." Is this just something included in the poster's graphic of the judge's order or was this really included? The Microsoft Paint-like addition of the picture also seems super unprofessional to me, but I don't read judge's orders on any sort of regular basis so I wanted to make sure I was seeing what I was seeing correctly. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics