Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Meghan King Edmonds loses custody of kids to Jim Edmonds"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We're definitely only hearing from Jim's side. That report was crazy: she "*gets* to see the kids for a few weeks every summer". It was presented in such an extreme way. Maybe there is more to the story.[/quote] Yes, the story is likely much worse for her to have agreed to only a few weeks custody per year. [/quote] This kind of stuff happens to women all the time. Look at Elon Musk's baby mammas. Powerful, influential, rich men win in custody battles. It's not a fair fight. We have no idea what happened in this case because we've only heard from Jim's PR team. Moral of the story - it's not a good idea to have babies with someone who has a massive power imbalance over you. [/quote] Elon is a great comparison. The only stable baby momma he had had custody of her kids. The rest have minimal. Similar to Jim. Jim’s prior ex’s had primary custody. Only Meghan doesn’t…[/quote] Yeah, I don't think Jim really wants primary custody but will step up in a case like this where it's needed. And I absolutely believe she'd be screaming about this unless the truth is very embarrassing.[/quote] She's screamed too many embarrassing things to count. She's been silenced by him and his attorneys, whether through a gag order or threats that led to a negotiated settlement. [/quote] There's no gag order or his side wouldn't be able to talk either. The only threat would be to release more embarrassing info, which would only be harmful if it were true. Your stanning is very odd.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics