Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Crown boundary study Option H"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Do you really trust MCPS data? MCPS’s enrollment projections have shifted dramatically in recent years, and the forecasts for Crown are especially unstable because the surrounding area is still developing. The demographics and utilization shown in Option H represent only one snapshot in time. As Crown continues to grow with new housing and new students, today’s numbers will not reflect long-term reality. Building a major boundary change on inconsistent or speculative projections is not responsible planning. It's also important to separate two issues that MCPS is trying to merge: boundary adjustments and building conditions. Boundary studies should focus on geography, walkability and community stability. The aging Wootton facility is a capital planning problem caused by years of deferred maintenance. Moving thousands of students to the school far from their neighborhoods is not a substitute for proper CIP funding, and using Crown as a holding school was never the purpose of this boundary study.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics