Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Swimming and Diving
Reply to "Cuts for Making HS Team"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Have a swimmer on a HS team and she is saying that no one makes it who doesn't have at least a 1:10 in 100 free (women's). Not sure how accurate that is. [/quote] For my kid's school it's 1:02. And yes, there will be cuts to get down to 30 girls, and yes some kids who swim club will be cut.[/quote] 1:02? Is this a local school - that seems very fast. [/quote] And a really stupid metric for someone who is, say, a breast specialist [/quote] I do not know any breast specialists who are not also well under a minute in the 100 free. If they can't hit that, it's an excuse, not a specialty. 55 seconds, sure maybe not reasonable, but a minute two?[/quote] I can think of a bunch. We’re talking about 13 and 14-year-old girls.[/quote] Actually, we're talking about 14 to 18 year old girls. And as a specific example, all the winter classic B finalists in open 100 breast and the 14 year olds in 13-14 tonight have a 100 free under a minute. All the "specialists" should be making the B final.[/quote] You’re comparing winter classic finalists with kids fighting to make the bottom of a bloated high school team roster. Apples and hand grenades. [/quote] I'm saying that 1:02.50 is a perfectly reasonable standard for 100 freestyle to keep the team from getting too bloated, and someone saying they can't meet that standard because they're a breaststroker is full of it.[/quote] 1:02.5 a reasonable standard: Ok Can’t meet it because there’re a breaststroke: Not full of it at all. Just say you don’t know any breaststroke specialists. I’d gladly give you names of 5 kids I can personally name that fall under this criteria. But I’m not calling kids out. Hell, in 1 minute of research I came up with five 13-14 girls that made NVSL all stars in breaststroke that were not in the top 100 in freestyle, and aren’t sniffing 1:02. [/quote] 50s without blocks in summer league is not relevant here, especially since they are competing with 15-18 for spots. I would say a specialist should be under 1:16 for breast. PVS girls I saw right at that standard are all under 1:02 in free. If one isn't, well she might have to wait until sophomore year to join a varsity team.[/quote] +1, can the NVSL summer swim people go away for at least another few months? Summer swim doesn’t mean anything and isn’t a valid comparison point, it’s 50 SCM races with no blocks, no touchpads, outdoors, etc. Specialist is also relative, your best stroke may be breaststroke but if you're under the A time standard I wouldn’t necessarily say you’re a “specialist”. When I think specialist I think of the swimmer who is at least champs level in a stroke but is nowhere close to that level in any other event. The higher level swimmer you are talking about, the more rare that is.[/quote] -Yeah, swimming outdoors doesn't count! I mean, except for the Olympics, Pro Series Events, and European Champs. -And no touchpads? I mean, those times are likely off by minutes! -Would you prefer we not use the word, "specialist" and just say "best stroke by a fair margin"? Would that make you feel better? That 13-14G NVSL all-star was just a quick and easy example to see 5 top-tier swimmers in one small snapshot. Those 100y times: [b]Free / Breast[/b] 1:04 / 1:15 1:05 / 1:13 1:06 / 1:17 1:10 / 1:17 1:05 / 1:17 +1 that doesn't have recent SCY times, but would not be able to hit 1:02 in 100y Free Just because you don't see it, or don't want to see it, doesn't mean it's not there. It's ok to be wrong. [/quote] Stay crazy NVSL parent, and keep telling yourself that summer recreation league swim is the barometer that swimmers should be judged on 🙄 I’m going to be real, the PVS Open breaststroke cut (because that’s the cut that matters for most HS swimmers who are between 15-18) is a 1:14.49, so only one of those girls would even qualify for PVS champs. The reality is those girls are just mid level club swimmers not these super strong breaststrokers that aren’t that good at freestyle.[/quote] You can't see the forest through the trees. The entire thread is about a subset of kids trying out for a HS team, worrying about cuts. Not kids making Champs times. Kids clinging to the bottom of the HS roster. -These kids are mostly going to be 14-15 y/o. 17/18s aren't trying out for a HS team hoping to make it after getting cut 3 years in a row. -This is about kids being good at one stroke but not another. I picked breaststroke as an example. Obv summer league is not THE barometer. Without naming children, it's a simple way to show kids that some people can be decent at one stroke and not that great at another, which others called outlandish. Reading comprehension on this board is abysmal for so many.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics