Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "NYT Headline “Did Women Ruin the Workplace?”"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We have a woman that had a kid then went in leave for 6 months, came back for 6 months and is going out again because she is having a other kid. Who knows when she will be back a full year.[/quote] But, I thought MAGA wanted women to have more kids, and have them younger. [/quote] Yeah MAGA doesn’t want women to work. [/quote] No, MAGA wants families to make decisions that work for them and stop putting pressure on women to become Girl Bosses if their actual nature is more domestic. People throw a lot of shade at SAHMs. I've never been a SAHM but I find it completely disgusting that feminism has set up a two tier system with SAHMs as the underclass that aren't quite meeting the mark. Women being a lot to the table outside of a paycheck and the left has no issue disparaging capitalism except in the context of feminism. [/quote] I think people keep falling for straw feminist caricatures of the sort portrayed in the article, ie an overly caffeinated girlboss with pronouns who sneers at domesticity. That’s not at all what feminism is. Feminism is just the idea that women should be treated equally and have agency over their lives, whether they work for money or stay home, have kids or not, go to college or not, etc. Women should be able to choose the path they want without being pressured, fearmongered, or shamed into it. A SAHM can still be a feminist, and vice versa.[/quote] +1[/quote] Sure. I don't believe the right supports this. Not when they glorify people like Charlie Kirk who did not actually support this. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics