Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Sidwell Basketball Article"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/papers/1287.pdf Use something similar to this methodology and Sidwell comes out on top, I'd bet.[/quote] For those who just scrolled down and found Harvard as #1. The paper clearly states.... "[i]Because we do not have a fully representative sample of college applicants, we rank only about a hundred undergraduate programs and our ranking is an example, not definitive."[/i] This is an example of how they may rank schools if they ever did. They are proving a "method" they are not ranking schools. The method is the same used for ranking chess players. They want to see if the method would work for colleges.)\ It's actually very telling because they go on to say... [i]"Colleges do not necessarily want to manipulate their matriculation rate and admissions rate; they feel compelled to do so[/i]." Which is why SAT, AP and NMS are important in MCPS and the privates here - not that it is meaningful but that is how they are ranked so they feel compelled to manipulate the system. The purpose of this paper is to see if they can find a ranking that can "eliminate manipulation" of these numbers. So admission rates are not a good measurement - or we must believe this right because Wharton said so... (tounge in cheek) "[i]In Section II of the paper, we further discuss the weaknesses of using the matriculation rate and the admissions rate as measures of revealed preference, and show how these measures can easily be manipulated."[/i] They also go on to say... "Although the sample was constructed to include students from every region of the country, it is intentionally representative of applicants to highly selective colleges and therefore non-representative of American high school students as a whole." So in short - I agree to the person that posted this link this is a good way to rank Sidwell because DCUM posters are NOT representative of families with 8th graders in DC/VA/MD as a whole.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics