Reply to Why do elite SLACs and Small R1s value athletic recruits

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Why do elite SLACs and Small R1s value athletic recruits"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It would be great if colleges committed to devote athletic recruits 100% to URM, FG, and LI.  Our next president should have a compact with colleges.  [/quote]

+1000

The pipeline to athletics recruits is designed to be the least inclusive and the least equitable.  Zero effort is made to train, reach out to, and recruit URM, FG, and LI.  It’s a disgrace.[/quote]

So colleges are now supposed to train kids in athletics for possible recruitment in the future? In what world does this make sense?[/quote]

It makes sense because there is huge barriers for disadvantaged kids.  All the money, the coach, the facilities, the travel, the equipment, or even as simple as the clothing, for an "athlete" is unimagineable to the disadvantaged kids.  My son's volleyball team has a black teammate, the club team waived all the fees for him thanks to the donation, but he couldn't afford travelling so we volunteered to take that responsibility.  But his athletic talent is 10x of my son's yet they are playing in the same club.

The high school sports are essentially inaccessible to disadvantaged kids.  Everyone knows that yet colleges continue this inequitable practice.  Rick Singers are busy working since the kids were five...[/quote]High school sports are essentially free and many require nothing to be purchased by the student except for shoes. [b]An excellent athlete that can’t afford club sports will likely find scholarship opportunities [/b]for clubs and private schools as well as they are always looking for an edge. I wouldn’t be worried about disadvantaged kids finding athletic opportunities, but I would be worried about the youth sports machinery talking advantage of disadvantaged kids (and stupid wealthy kids for that matter).  See Michael Oher.[/quote]
So...it is expensive and inaccessible. You literally just repeated their point.
Most sports don't have the scholarship or other funding opportunities as football/basketball. You need money to compete competitively in tennis, for example.[/quote]I going to simplify this for you: If a kid can ball, then there will be plenty of chances to play ball regardless of financial circumstances. The revenue sports are very accessible to everyone. [/quote]
That’s just not true. Like obviously not true. Most high schools offer a limited amount of sports and most communities don’t have access to public facilities for anything that isn’t basketball. It’s weird to see someone be so lazy about their lying.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics