Reply to New presentation on program analysis and boundary study up

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "New presentation on program analysis and boundary study up "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Isn’t Einstein IB locally managed? So they could keep IB and performing arts? We chose Einstein in good faith through the DCC process and it’s so disheartening to try and make sense of all of this when there been zero transparent engagement with DCC families. I how the BoE stands up to this.[/quote]

I don't support keeping random IB programs.  They cost money and will inevitably be worse than the regional version.  What is the point?[/quote]

Rockville HS's local IB program outperforms regional IB programs at Springbrook and Kennedy.[/quote]

So?  Rockville will be in a region with RM, so again, it would make no sense to keep their local program.[/quote]

It's hard to have meaningful discussions when MCPS isn't sharing information and possibly doesn't even know itself,  but, the information  given so far says the plan is to shrink the existing programs while making more deployments.  So how would RMIB's part-local cohort plus Rockville's all-local cohort together fit inside the new smaller regional program?

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics