Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wallace’s response to the Motion To Compel with respect to him. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/707/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/ He attests to not having any Signal communications related to Lively.[/quote] Pretty sure we know he was included on some Signal communications, so that means he deleted everything.[/quote] Signal has a “disappear” function that causes messages to self delete (on all devices) after a certain amount of time. Do Blake’s attorneys not know how it works? They aren’t getting anything useful from discovery on Signal, if it ever existed. [/quote] Their argument was he should have turned that feature off because he should have known he was going to be sued. Maybe it will work with Liman but its generally not a great argument for Wallace prior to the CRD being filed, I think he had a reasonable argument he didn't expect to be sued at that point. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
