Reply to Should admissions be more transparent?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Should admissions be more transparent?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]At a HS "college day", I directly asked an AO if they think it is ethical and responsible to disclose institutional priorities to prospective students. Without hesitation, the AO said no! Because then they would only get applicants with those characteristics.  For background, we as parents were given a faux case study with a fictitious college with their institutional priorities, and 3 common app applications with essays to review and discuss. At the end, we had to vote accept, reject, waitlist. The vote was pretty clear to choose the candidate that met the college institutional priority- not the strongest kid nor the more interesting candilate. The 'admitted' candidate was a male, first gen, from a rural town. I found the process both illuminating and disheartening. I do think schools have an ethical obligation to be more explicit with their goals. The high achieving girl who showed great curiosity and impact wasted her time and $. Yes, my kid has a savvy mom who reads posts, books. Podcasts, etc. - but many do not. The process is NOT equitable. Wealthy applicants pay for suppport and many fgli and urm in our community have access to special free application support. However, those in the middle are without access to this helpful information which influences admission. Fyi. I am not bitter. My kid got accepted to their top choice... but we totally played the game. It was bs, but it worked. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics