Reply to SATC: what is it that Big found hard to handle about Carrie?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "SATC: what is it that Big found hard to handle about Carrie?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Carrie and Big defined the 2000s and contributed greatly to the erosion of dating, marriage, and American values.

1) A chauffeured loner is supposed to be a "cool finance guy." He's not. He's an uncharismatic dork doing a Gordon Gekko impression.

2) A middle aged shrew advice columnist nobody reads is the "hot girl." She's not.

3) Their on-again/off-again sometimes f buddies, sometimes just phone pals crap is mockery of family values. It was the vangard for gen-x and millennial quasi-polyamorous floating listlessly through life.

4) They're not funny. Think of the funniest thing either one of them did. Can you think of *anything*? Even throw in Charlotte and Sam. In retrospect, I'm struggling to think of one time the cast made me smirk. It later evolved to, we're all just watching for the...hideous fashion and to see if Big will ever marry the shrew?

5) After breaking women's brains with SATC, they salted the earth with a few movies and now this senior citizen 'just like that' streaming series. "Just do whatever, girl bosses focus on career and shoes and vodka cocktails, family can wait, we're so fun, quirky and hard to please hehe"...how is this aspirational again?[/quote]

Lol I guess that’s why the show was such a dud 🤣[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics