Reply to I quit drinking and have experienced no discernable benefit

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "I quit drinking and have experienced no discernable benefit"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We have long known that processed meat - bacon, sausage, pepperoni, as well as red meat is a carcinogen and it has been recognized as such and due to the industry you never ever hear about avoiding it on a regular basis whereas right now, huge alcohol is the devil message everywhere. [/quote]

What's your gut instinct about why the focus is alcohol now vs red meat, processed food, environmental factors, etc? [/quote]

DP here. It’s two things: the cannabis lobby and further testing by government to see how messaging works to change society. Will enough of society stop thinking critically and follow the herd if the right messaging is repeated over and over? For the last year, the answer was largely yes, but I think people are finally starting to wake up.[/quote]

+1  I'm really starting to buy into the conspiracy theory that the cannabis lobby is behind the recent negative messaging around alcohol.  Even in DCUM you had a post immediately after the surgeon general's recommendation asking for recommendations of gummies or a THC drink to replace alcohol.[/quote]

You think the cannabis lobby is more powerful than the booze lobby? Come on.[/quote]

OP here. You've summarized my take.  Something seems off-normal and coordinated about the campaign to tell us that our skin, sleep, and spirit will improve with no alcohol. And it also seems that there's a lot of cannabis ads. But I would be surprised if cannabis is better organized than alcohol. Maybe cannabis is being bought up by powerful companies? On its face, it doesn't seem like this is the likely reason for all of this. [/quote]

There is simply something going on here. In the NYT This Morning email there was a link to yet ANOTHER article about cutting back on alcohol. After just running one on Monday. One commenter on this article--because again, at least a few are starting to ask why, NYT--one person said they think it's Biden's last-ditch effort to make some kind of difference. That may be a stretch, and it's pretty pathetic. But something is up. This just doesn't make sense. Article after article, with nothing new. [/quote]

I think the main thing that’s going on is that they reassessed the study/studies that suggested wine had any health benefits — turns out the benefits were relative only; wine drinkers weren’t being compared to non-drinkers, only to drinkers of hard liquors. Then the more they looked at the  data using real controls, the worse it seemed.

Did people assume “something was up” when the media started discussing the harms of cigarettes, I wonder? It feels comparable — something that most of us do, that humans have done forever, that’s a source of real pleasure, that we assume probably isn’t great but can’t be *that* bad. If anyone remembers the anti-smoking shift, I’d be curious if the conversation/skepticism feels similar. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics