Reply to Pam Bondi - new nom for AG

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pam Bondi - new nom for AG "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think the qualifications for DOJ nominee need to be:
NOT from Florida
NOT having ever representing Trump in a legal matter. Isn't that as blatant a conflict of interest as it could possibly be? Not only that, it was in one of his impeachment trials (although of course she didn't have to actually do anything.)
NOT have skeletons pertaining to dogs or sex.
NOT have a law degree from the school ranked 98th. [/quote]

No, that’s just a list of cheap attacks at Pam Bondi.  Can you give the name of one Republican you would support or at least tolerate for AG?  If not, that puts your attacks on Bondi in context.   [/quote]

Crickets

I knew you couldn’t provide a name.  You would lob silly attacks at whomever Trump appoints.  [/quote]

We know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that whomever trump nominates for any position in his cabinet that their loyalty is to trump not to the Constitution of the United States of America.  We know that he is not using the FBI to vet his choices which screams there must be a lot to hide in his appointees this far.

"First rate people surround themselves with first rate people. Second rate people surround themselves with third rate people.". (Leo Rosen) Trump proves this by his choices.[/quote]

You are incredibly misguided.  I won't frustrate us both by debating you, but I will just say that I am so happy that your view of  President Trump was so strongly rejected by the American people.[/quote]

The final count according to The Nation.  Trump won but did not get 50%.  He received 49.94 and Harris received 48.26.  he won by 1.68 percent and this, poor deluded one,  is not a mandate.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/donald-trump-vote-margin-narrowed/[/quote]

The mandate comes from the seven swing states.  The rest of the country (both electoral and popular vote) is baked in along party lines and would not change no matter who the candidates are. But those seven states were up for grabs, so both candidates devoted their resources to getting their message out, and the result was 7-0 for Trump.  Anyone with an open mind (which I know you are not) saw that his vision for the country was a lot better than the left, and that he is a much better candidate than his opponent.[/quote]

+1
The PP will never admit this.  Those 7 swing states are the mandate.  And Dems would be saying the same thing had they swept them.  But, they did not.[/quote]

Trump won with 49.94 and Harris got 48.26. did not get 50 percent of votes cast. This is not a mandate no matter how MAGAS try to skew the votes.  Johnson against Goldwater had a mandate with 61.1 percent of the vote.  This is a mandate!  A margin of 1.64 % of the vote is winning by the skin of his teeth!
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics