Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "World University Rankings 2025"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If these were comparable schools, they would enroll comparable students. Let's see: UMich class of 2027: https://obp.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubdata/factsfigures/firstyearsprofile_umaa.pdf 102 national merit finalists out of 7500 freshman SAT: 1350 to 1530 ACT: 31 to 34 Cornell (least selective ivy stats from 3 years ago): https://irp.dpb.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Profile2021-first-year.pdf SAT range: 1450 to 1540 ACT: 33 to 35 Duke: SAT: 1520 to 1570 ACT: 34 to 35 https://admissions.duke.edu/our-students/ 119 national merit finalists out of 1700 freshman Keep telling yourself it's close[/quote] This thread is about a ranking of the quality of universities, not the SAT scores of undergrads. That some of you conflate the two goes a long way to explaining your frustration.[/quote] and quality has a lot to do with the quality of students that get enrolled. after all, smarter peers result in more challenging curriculums being taught and association with smarter classmates [/quote] Except these rankings are mostly about graduate schools, where SATs do not matter. Grad students are a different kettle of fish. [/quote] And research, which gets a huge amount of weight in the rankings. Because, ya know, “research universities.” It’s sort of their thing. [/quote] Then we agree. These rankings are not a reflection of undergrad rank.[/quote] Research and funding for said research absolutely affects the undergraduate experience. If you have been on the tours of the US colleges who are top20 and beyond, they all emphasize research opportunities for undergraduates. Everywhere from MIT to William and Mary mentioned it because it is a very important resume builder for all fields. Most internships are not available before junior year. The most resourced schools with the lowest student-faculty ratios get students in all fields into research. These top universities in the world rankings correlate highly with the % of undergraduate research that is paid. Talk to students at these schools and talk to faculty who have taught at one of the top 10-15 US ones versus below a top 60 —they are very different! Almost 100% of undergraduate research is paid at many of these top places. The ability to conduct real research with faculty and get paid is an incredible opportunity for undergraduates. [/quote] I actually disagree. Undergraduates have better access to research opportunities in well funded and endowed SLACs or smaller universities. Do you know how cash strapped some of the departments in these universities are that they accept foreign money to "do research"? Just google and you will find some of these top 10 schools guilty of taking foreign money. [/quote] [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics