Reply to Volleyball Action

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "Volleyball Action"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My daughter (13U eligible) is seriously considering trying out for Paramount as it is closest to where we live.

I’d love for my daughter to play in a club where she can play for years (if she’s good enough to make the team each year). So I’m doing my research to find a club where my daughter can develop and grow her love for volleyball!

Paramount is a strong club in CHRVA but I heard some dramas happened last season across multiple age groups. Does anyone know what really happened with Paramount’s teams last season? This is what I’ve heard-

13-1: coach got fired
16-1: coach quit mid-season
17-1: multiple players quit mid-season

Did this really happen? I know every club has dramas but this seems a bit too much. Is VA Juniors a better alternative?

[/quote]
Not a Paramount parent, but I did hear from a parent of a player on the 17s team that multiple players quit mid-season.

As to the other two, I don't know the reasons why, but it does appear by comparing rosters from tournaments for the early part of the season to the end of the season that both the head coaches from the 13-1s and 16-1s were different from the beginning of the season to the end.

Volley by the James in January [url]https://events.sportwrench.com/#/events/d8f1923be/clubs/31948[/url]

USAV Nationals in July [url]https://results.advancedeventsystems.com/event/PTAwMDAwMzM4MDQ90/clubs/14217/standings[/url] and
[url]https://results.advancedeventsystems.com/event/PTAwMDAwMzM4MDM90/clubs/14217/standings[/url][/quote]

Do you know why 17-1 players quit mid season? I heard it was because of playing time but it’s hard to believe they pay $$$ for Paramount and just quit mid season. [/quote]

Clearly the coaching change was good for the 16s: they finished 5th place overall at USAV GJNC in the National Division

Clearly the players that quit the team for 17s weren't key contributors, as that team finished 5th overall in the American Division of GJNC[/quote]
Not sure I understand your logic. Correlation does not equal causation.  Isn't it just as likely that both of those teams would have finished higher at GJNC if there was less turmoil?[/quote]

Not sure who made this comment about changes being good. But to me it sounds like Paramount only cares for result and not its players. I really hope that’s not the case. But whoever wrote that changes were good, I’m disappointed in your logic. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics