Reply to Kamala Harris Says Anyone Who Breaks Into Her House Is ‘Getting Shot’

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Kamala Harris Says Anyone Who Breaks Into Her House Is ‘Getting Shot’"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She said she would let her staff  “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).

Staff now saying she was just joking.

Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her!  She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….[/quote]

If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.[/quote]

How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.[/quote]

Did Harris make that choice of what firearm to own?  Yes she did.

Do other people get that same choice? Not according to her.[/quote]

She should have had the freedom to choose between any six-shooter or deer rifle on the market? Of course she should! Should she have access to military assault rifles, grenades, missiles, tanks, bombs... you know weapons intended to kill or wound lots of people very quickly.... no, of course she shouldn't have that choice and anyone with an IQ above 90 agrees with me. If you disagree, please do your best to explain why private citizens should have access to grenades, bombs, or assault rifles. [/quote]

Your definition of an assault rifle?[/quote] A standard infantry weapon for modern armies that is light, portable, and can quickly and accurately deliver a high volume of fire to create mass casualty in a brief period of time. AR-15 is an example. I don't have a need for that weapon in my house just as I don't have a need for bombs. [/quote]

It isn't up to you.  It's none of your business.  [/quote]

Have you ever seen mangled six year old children after they've been stuck by a bullet fired by an assault rifle? Who does and doesn't have access to weapons of mass destruction is everyone's business. Idiot[/quote]

Your party's stance on soft-on-crime, social justice, restorative justice and allowing criminals to go free because you [u]want[/u] to is just one of many examples one should own as many firearms as they can.

At this point, I don't really care what you want.  You've lost all credibility by putting a soft-headed prosecutor who believes in reparations (her own statements) at the top of your ticket.[/quote]
My "party"? What is my party? It isn't just Democrats that can clearly see why private citizens don't need access to military grade weaponry. Anyone in this country and across the globe that has an IQ over 90 has been able to put two and two together to figure this out. Conservatives, liberals, Muslims, Christians and Jews of all colors with any basic reasoning skills have been able to figure this out... [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics