Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Supreme Court Refuses to Take Up TJ Admissions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How do they determine the top 1.5%? Surely a lot of kids in the same middle school are going to have straight A's in the core subjects and will be in honors classes. Certainly more kids in each school will meet that criteria and want to go than the 10-15 that get selected.[/quote] Using lottery selection [/quote] That is literally false. Applicants are scored on a variety of factors, including grades, a proctored problem-solving essay, and the student portrait sheet, plus experience factors. It is not a lottery. The fact that the criteria are not your preferred criteria does not make it a lottery. [/quote] Everyone is going to have great grades and [b]most serious candidates will do well on the test[/b][b][/b]. An native english speaking kid with middle class parents and no IEP will score zero on experience factors. That's going to be most applicants from traditional feeders. When everyone has the same scores, it's a lottery [/quote] Thank you for conceding that the test effectively screens out non-serious candidates. So the students who get through both have top grades and are serious candidates for admission to TJ. That’s not a lottery; it’s an effective admissions process. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics