Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Swimming and Diving
Reply to "Why doesn’t USA Swimming use cut-off dates like every other youth sport?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^ and this is why it’s easy to see who has a kid without a Feb/early March bday when they argue it’s equitable the way it is. I get that they need some kind of cut off but to say it’s fair is wrong. If it is so fair, then do it for summer swim and kids age up mid season. The same relay problem happens during club swimming when a kid ages up…so that’s the same problem year round. [/quote] The summer swim argument is a completely different issue. It’s like an 8 week season and a PITA to deal with aging kids up on their birthdays, although in theory I wouldn’t be opposed to it. Relays are a fun part of the big club meets but they mean nothing and often the kids swimming the relays are from all different sites of a club and may have never met each other before that day. In a true individual sport like club swim is, you can’t have a kid that turned 11 in January swimming 10 and under events in mid/late March. Your argument really boils down to wanting to disadvantage someone other than your February/March birthday kid. [/quote] Nope. It’s not about disadvantaging someone else. It’s about consistency and not disadvantaging anyone. Do you really think an 11 yr +2 months is very different from a 10 yr 11 months? The 10 year old with an April birthday is 10 yr+11 mos swimming against 9 yr+0 mos currently. Is that more fair?[/quote] Oh please, it absolutely is about disadvantaging someone else as long as that someone is not your kid. It’s an individual sport that is divided by age group categories, there is no reason to swim as anything other than your actual age. [/quote] Who is it disadvantaging? Please do tell. [/quote] Are you really that obtuse? You know damn well that allowing kids who turn 11 in January to race as 10 and unders in mid to late March disadvantages the spring birthday kids who would otherwise be in line to make finals, be on relays, etc. [/quote] Are YOU serious? You’re talking about kids who are 3 months apart in age. [/quote] I mean your kid can just get faster so they don’t have to rely on being allowed to swim as a 10 and under months after they turn 11. [/quote] Lol. Nice! And your kid can stop relying on the fact that they are basically two years older than the youngest ones in their age group and can only qualify/win because of that stroke of luck. Does your nearly-13 year old really feel superior for crushing kids who just turned 11 days ago and spent the whole season training as a 10 and under? [/quote] No, I actually have one of those kids that can make the cuts even when they age up right before the meet (late spring birthday, made LC champs in multiple events at the low end of the age group). It never crossed my mind to think that my kid should have been able to swim LC champs in the younger age bracket because they had just aged up a couple months earlier. Honestly it would have been kind of embarrassing for my kid to show up and trounce people in the age group below. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics