Reply to The coordinated attack on D.E.I. is a vast right wing conspiracy

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "The coordinated attack on D.E.I. is a vast right wing conspiracy"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DEI programs have nothing to do with inclusion, diversity or equity. They are deliberately designed to exclude people that are not members of the woke left's preferred minority groups, instill guilt and shame in non-members and provide a rationale for asset seizures from non-members to right contrived grievances.

People confuse DEI with equality.  DEI initiatives don't want equality and equal opportunitiesbut rather equity, which means equal outcomes no matter the input.  It is a social engineering program that has nothing to do with equality.  It may come as a shock to people, but individuals are different. Individuals have different experiences and aptitudes...there will be candidates who are better than others. DEI doesn't care about any of that though and thinks we should all have equal outcomes in the end.  It is just communism wrapped up in package under a different name.  No one is fooled. 
  [/quote]

How do you explain why so many mediocre men have been promoted to the top over more qualified and experienced women?[/quote]

You are conflating equal opportunities with equity. The latter is what DEI wants, not the former. No one is debating they women deserve their fair shake at equal opportunity.

DEI wants equitable outcomes for women who do the same job as men. On paper that sounds good, but in practice this means hiring or promoting women who are grossly unqualified into positions because we need to fast track equitable outcomes. That's not equality. It is social engineering and communism.

Maybe back in the 1980s men could skate by.  But in the modern world the tables are now reversed and there are so many unqualified to mid women who get hired for jobs or promoted into leadership positions just so the corporate world can show they're meeting a quota. [/quote]

Dunno. Turnabout is fair play. Did you ever complain or speak out in the past about the undeserving men who were promoted above deserving candidates? Why not? If not then take a chill pill. I am not going to cry over this given how often and even in recent times I’ve seen the reverse happen. [/quote]

That pretty much sums of the state of DEI. It's not about DEI, it's about revenge. It's no wonder there's such backlash from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.[/quote]

It’s about getting us o ground zero if you want.

Unless you spoke up about the unfair advantages men had and continue to have in many fields it’s kind of baffling why you suddenly care if women seem to have them. [/quote]

So revenge.

At least you can stop labeling as DEI and just call a spade a spade - you want revenge, or perhaps even vengeance for any contrived slight you come up with next.

Total brainwashing. 
[/quote]

Diversity and inclusion. What’s wrong with those two words?

I’ve never been on a hiring panel that had one star candidate so obviously superior to the other candidates who was then rejected in favor of an unqualified candidate for reasons of diversity. And I’ve hired a lot. Never once been in that situation.

It’s telling that you seem to think that white men are always the best candidate. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics