Reply to Baby Missing After Carjacking in Georgetown Early This Evening (30th & M St. NW)

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Baby Missing After Carjacking in Georgetown Early This Evening (30th & M St. NW)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The baby was left in the car seat on a street in SE but the car is still missing. Curious about where/with who?

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/4-month-old-girl-found-after-being-taken-in-georgetown-car-theft/3508529/

Thank goodness she is safe.[/quote]

I hope these guys get charged with kidnapping and child abuse, and get put away for a long time. [/quote]

Sounds like these guys are on the loose joyriding in the jeep? At our councilmembers safety walk the USAO representative told us they can't charge carjackers cos when four sets of prints are found they don't know who the jacker was.. COMPLETE IMPUNITY and zero solutions offered.[/quote]

Hope you told them what utter bullshit this was!  4sets of fingerprints?  Arrest and charge them all, unless there is a reason for that fingerprint in the car.  Are these people STUPID? [/quote]
I’m a former prosecutor so I will take a crack at explaining why it is difficult to charge someone with carjacking based on fingerprints alone. When a car gets jacked by say several people who are masked and wearing generic dark clothing, the lookout for the suspects is obviously weak and the victim won’t be able to make an ID of people that did the carjacking. Then say the car is recovered the next day abandoned. The vehicle is printed and you get some hits off the prints. All you can prove is that the people whose prints were in the vehicle had been inside it at some point. You cannot prove that those people jacked the vehicle. You also can’t prove that they went joyriding in it after it was jacked because it was jacked with a key, so there wasn’t anything that would indicate to a passenger in the vehicle that the car was stolen. If, say the jackers weren’t masked and the victims got a look at the suspects, you can definitely put the people whose prints were found inside the car in photo arrays and show them to the victims and maybe they ID the jackers. [/quote]

This is exactly what we were told at Frumin's "safety meeting". Maybe by YOU. WTF don't they have to explain how their prints came to be in a vehicle that is not theirs? How about if their prints are found in ANOTHER vehicle that's not theirs, we say "that's QUITE a coincidence" and throw them in jail? Tween/teen carjackers are obviously taking advantage of 'the benefit of the doubt' on repeat. Law makers and prosecutors need to address this.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics