Reply to When the smallest doubt is treated as support of the other side

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "When the smallest doubt is treated as support of the other side"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’ll try to make it as general as possible. What if there is a hot topic, A  vs B. Say most people around you support A. You do, too, but you have questions or doubts about A, or you can understand (but not support) B’s reasoning. you don’t perceive A as something flawless. 
However if you ask those questions, or even don’t support A with all your heart, you are labeled as (insert whatever insult du jour you can think of). 
How to deal with it? 
I find that in the most recent conflicts I can’t support one side without reservation, yet it seems like I am expected to. I am genuinely scared of all the silence is violence type tropes. [/quote]

It sounds like you are talking about the Israel/Palestine conflict.  Israel was attacked by Hamas and attacked back, but if anyone expresses concern for the Palestinians (not Hamas), then you are labeled and a Hamas sympathizer.  I get it.  Like a PP said, we are now supporting loyalties, and there is no more critical thinking allowed.  It’s sad.[/quote]

Or if you criticize Netanyahu's settler policies you are called an antisemite.

I don't think people can legitimately attack when you cite specifics.  They can try, but it's foolish.[/quote]

The problem is that many people are unable to cite specifics.  The example above of J6 denial shows that.  Trump supporters say things like "deep state" but lack specific evidence and end up looking like fools.

Basically, people need to do better.  But most people can either barely scratch the surface of a topic or are so far down a rabbit hole of delusions and fabrications that there's nothing coherent to be had from it.[/quote]

The problem is you think this delusional behavior runs one way. Progressives have looked like idiots trying to walk back a number of issues on which they were demanding unquestioned fealty from all.

The likes of you cannot see this, because you are drowning in your own righteousness.

YOU are the problem.[/quote]

Ahh finally there we have it.  The whole intent of this thread was to try and find some way to smear the left.

Glad that's established and out in the open now.[/quote]

Why are you getting defensive?

This is about behavior, not ideology or affiliation. You are exhibiting the behavior of a zealot and you are blind to it. You are the the cousin of the MAGA you so despise.[/quote]

Sure, Mr. Zealous and Righteous, Mr. My Point Is The Only Relevant Thing.  Whatever you say.  Aye aye, Capitano.   :lol: [/quote]

Take it up with the OP, or start a new thread about your pet obsessions, Comrade.[/quote]

"Comrade?"  Sounds like something an obsessive person would say.[/quote]

Look at how the PP has projected some kind of delusional image of anyone who disagrees with them of being a communist by calling them "comrade."   Proved the OP's point to a T.[/quote]

Another funny thing about zealots is they have no sense of humor and can't recognize sarcasm. If the shoe fits...[/quote]

DP.
It’s gaslighting
“But I was joking; can’t you take a joke?!”
Classic [/quote]

It's not gaslighting. You probably call everything gaslighting, to the point that the term has lost all meaning.

Everyone knows most "progressives" in America aren't really about that commie life. They enjoy comfort and capitalist luxuries too much.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics