Reply to Banning AR-15s

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Banning AR-15s"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m going to buy another just because of this hyperventilation. The first I have kitted ip over my fireplace in Fairfax. [/quote]

Great, unsecured and visible from a window. But at least you'll have the other one to mount over your commode. Then you'll be ready to chase down the guy who tries to snatch the first one if you don't trip over your own pants.[/quote]

Realistically, he's going to stay hidden in the bathroom. That's how these things typically go.[/quote]

Really? https://youtu.be/IFhkcgdkrY8?si=tmmAZH_9j50cF7s6[/quote]

NP, but not even watching whatever BS this is, every post about actual data, research, and solutions about reducing gun homicides is met with middle school level talk and deflection.

Republicans are NOT serious about focusing on the number one cause of death for children in America. Instead, it's about deflection re: Gender which (last I checked) doesn't show up as a leading statistical cause of death on any list. Deflection, deflection, deflection.

Stop and Frisk is the only supposedly serious solution offered, but the research on Stop and Frisk was not remotely definitive and many studies (when you don't cherry pick one to prove your point) found it didn't actually do anything, on top of the potential for constitutional infringement of rights (which 2a activists should take seriously or they are hypocrites).[/quote]

Video shows a black man saving an Indian man from a robber armed with a knife, using his handgun. Didn’t even have to put down the six pack of light beer.[/quote]

Do you not understand anecdote vs. empirical research? Your video is anecdote. Research is different. Let me guess, now you go to cherry pick some research by the infamous and disproven John Locke? I'll wait. [/quote]

We found during Covid how research could be very skewed, even suppressed and/or falsified. Research is only as good as those behind it.[/quote]

You mean like when multiple studies were found to have falsified data making it seem as though Ivermectin is helpful for COVID? Oh yes, remember that, I work in healthcare.

Aggregate research findings matter. John Locke is one person who has disproven by numerous other researchers. If you ONLY believe one person and don't review the totality of research findings, you're likely prone to conspiracy type thinking and little will help you. So I'll stop arguing because it's generally useless to argue with someone who can't think critically and is prone to conspiracy type thinking. Will only believe what you're biased to believe, will move the goalposts if anyone posts anything contrary to what you are predetermined to believe. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics