Reply to SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So, you think it is appropriate for people to be FORCED to make statements in which they don't believe?[/quote]
Do you know what a wedding website is? It has info about hotel blocks and registries. It's not a statement of beliefs. [/quote]

So? She doesn’t believe in gay marriage. I wouldn’t do it either. [/quote]
Gay marriage exists. It’s not something to “believe” in. The issue is that she doesn’t [i]like[/i] it.[/quote]

Exactly. Dumb B could have simply said sorry I can’t take on more work.[/quote]

Her religion also forbids lying. [/quote]

Again random and illogical belief system that is exercised at arbitrary moments.[/quote]

It is still a reason. She shouldn't be required to lie and say she's busy. She should be able to say "I'm religiously opposed to that."  That should be legal. [/quote]
Why? Why should she be allowed to discriminate against people based on something they can’t change about themselves?[/quote]

More importantly, the book that this religion is based on is full of contradictions. Why do they pick the punishment/negative reaction instead of the loving one?! It’s very strange.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics