Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "No, test optional isn’t the reason your kid didn’t get in."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's a ZERO SUM GAME. If a lower score kid got lucky and got in with TO when otherwise wouldn't have even applied, there's another kid with higher score didn't get in. [/quote] Exactly. [/quote] Just because one kid had a higher test score doesn't mean they were overall a better applicant. [/quote] Higher score kids are usually overall a better applicant. [/quote] Where was this study researched? [/quote] MIT research and UC research but you can easily see. Check out the test scores for competitive elites schools and mediocre schools. Big difference in test scores. Why do you think it's that? [/quote] Plenty TO schools disagree with this claim. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
