Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "Grand Jury report on LCPS sexual assault cases is unsealed"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m not sure these criminal charges will stick. And the public information officer charged with perjury? It seems very politically motivated by Youngkin/Miyares. Guess we’ll see.[/quote] Agree. And will make the next guy's job that much harder (and finding him/her).[/quote] Between attacks on teachers and now criminal charges against school administrators, who on earth would want to work in the VA public education system right now? It’s all part of Youngkin’s strategy to dismantle public schools and privatize education.[/quote] Well hopefully it keeps out the people who want to take a laissez faire approach to students with sexual assault charges. Maybe we can get back to admins that take it seriously when teachers or parents report dangerous behavior.[/quote]he There was no laissez faire approach. Pure lies the rwnjs keep trying to push. Even the sro didn't think there was anything valid. She'd been having sex with the kid on the regular in the bathroom. The super could not say anything about the issue. He was in a difficult situation. You jerks have taken advantage of the difficult situation, just like you tried to villainize Fauci, to destroy the administration that seemed too liberal for you. This super is 100% a scapegoat. [/quote] The boy continued even after she withdrew consent, so despite a consensual history and even an interaction that began as intentional, it did become assault. However, this nuance consistently gets exploited by dishonest actors because if you mention the consensual history of bathroom sex between the two to highlight WHY the initial response was what it was, you’re accused of excusing a rapist or blaming the victim, neither of which are true. The response was insufficient AND it was clouded by the fact the two had been caught doing the same thing multiple times in a consensual context, which made it difficult to determine at first that this particular meetup had begun consensually but turned into an assault. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics