Reply to In-laws are mad that we are inviting others to Christmas dinner. How to resolve this?

Forum Index » Family Relationships

Reply to "In-laws are mad that we are inviting others to Christmas dinner. How to resolve this?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What’s there to resolve? They can either come or not. [/quote]

Exactly.  I wouldn’t disinvite over this, but would immediately step in if they make inappropriate comments (personally I think this is unlikely).[/quote]

+1. They need to get over themselves.

And, well done, OP, for demonstrating the WWJD lifestyle.

[/quote]

Yes, this is just the spirit to honor thy mother and father according to the Commandments like all good Christians do.  :roll: Sounds like cafeteria Christianity.[/quote]

Inviting people to Christmas isn’t dishonoring your mother and father so I don’t even know what point you are trying to make here.[/quote]

It's pretty obvious. The in-laws have said this plan makes them uncomfortable. And rather than work with them to make them comfortable and keep everyone happy the only acceptable solution is to take a hard stance, tell the in-laws to just stay home, and pat yourself on the back for being such a loving Christian who brags about their charity to others. Who cares about the people who raised the husband after all? [/quote]
The in-laws can act like grownups for one meal. Or they can make other plans. Their choice.[/quote]

Yes, make the houseguests uncomfortable. That's the holiday spirit.[/quote]

The houseguests are making themselves uncomfortable.  [/quote]

A good host makes all their guests comfortable.[/quote]

Within reason.  Better yet, a good host gives all their guests the opportunity to be comfortable.  But a good host will not sacrifice the comfort of one guest for the comfort of another.  OP's neighbors aren't asking for the inlaws to be disinvited -- the inlaws are declaring that they will not allow themselves to be comfortable if the neighbors are there.[/quote]

Is the answer to disinvite the in-laws? I thought invites could not be rescinded?[/quote]

Of course invitations can be rescinded - I'm not the PP that said they couldn't.  You shouldn't rescind invitations except in extreme circumstances, but declaring that another guest is unwelcome certainly qualifies.  The answer is to inform the in laws that the neighbors are OPs guests, and if they can't treat the neighbors with kindness, or if they truly feel that they cannot enjoy themselves if the neighbors are there, then the in laws should stay home.[/quote]

The bait and switch is a raw deal for in-laws who made travel plans [b]under the guise of a small and intimate family Christmas[/b].  [/quote]

OP never said this.[/quote]

It's in the OP. In-laws wanted to know who the extra people were. They were not expecting others at this small gathering.[/quote]

OP never invited the in laws under any guise of a small and intimate family Christmas.  That’s just flat out false.  She told them she would like to host Christmas and that it will be 13 people.  She is telling this all to them nearly a month in advance.  You are painting a completely false picture here to suggest somehow OP is in the wrong planning the guest list for her own dinner!  It’s absurd.[/quote]

Here is what OP actually said, you don't get to make up your own facts:

"I told my in laws today that it will be 13 people for Christmas dinner. They wanted to know where the extra people were coming from"

Where did the in-laws get the idea "extra" people were coming? Clearly the number wasn't 13 before. OP invited the family then added the neighbors after.[/quote]

That doesn't mean that OP pitched this as an "intimate, family only Christmas dinner."  It means that before, the guest list was shorter and consisted of only family.  There was no representation from the OP that they intended it to stay intimate and family-only.

And guess what?  Even if OP did say "In-laws, please come to our intimate, family-only Christmas dinner" and then invited the neighbors, that would STILL be ok. The circumstances had changed: OP became aware that the neighbors had nowhere to go on Christmas and accommodated her plans accordingly.  They're the hosts, and that's well within their rights to do so.   [/quote]

Maybe they have social anxiety, or are afraid of strangers, or are worried about germs from kids. Why brush all that off like its nothing? [/quote]

Because there's no basis for that.  Maybe they have secret knowledge that the neighbors are actually lizard people who require an invitation to Christmas dinner to finally implement their plans to take over the world!![/quote]

They literally said they don't want to eat with a bunch of strangers. That was the reason. Some people like to keep to themselves. OPs husband should be figuring this out, he knows what his people are like.[/quote]

That's a preference, not social anxiety or fear of germs.  But I agree that OP's husband should be handling all communications with his parents.[/quote]

These days you can't be too sure. People are still limiting their gatherings to small groups, not traveling, avoiding indoor parties, etc.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics