Reply to Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck.  The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so.  Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court.  Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html[/quote]

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

[/quote]

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking  preacher. [/quote]

Precisely this.  Too funny that LWNJs are taking the word of some preacher (of all people) as gospel because they’re so desperate for this story to be true.  Imagine if this Schenck guy had a story that was damaging to Democrats.  They’d be dismissing him with their usual disdain.  How incredibly predictable our friends on the left are.[/quote]

What’s really going on here: Leftists are pissed that the SC doesn’t rule the way they like so it’s illegitimate. They lost the house so now are onto something else to destroy[/quote]

What's really going on here:  the double standards and denials and lying of the GOP.  Every accusation is a confession.  [b]Whatever you say about the Left is what you are doing.  [/b]

[/quote]

You have that exactly opposite.  As usual.
DP[/quote]

Nope.  It's the standard GOP playbook.  Say the left is doing it and then they do it themselves.

And, of course, your response is typical GOP as well.  Lie, lie, lie. If you say it over and over, it becomes true, right?

Nope.  Give it up.[/quote]

Amazing that you continue to project your own issues into others.  Look at this thread - if enough LWNJs keep repeating nonsense, maybe your rubes will believe you!  Same old same old.  Let us know when this story has actually been proven.  Not interested in speculation or claims.   :roll: [/quote]

Np- oh come on now. You won’t be persuaded by proof either. [/quote]
+1 They really don’t care, but they know their side is in the wrong, hence the aggressive nature of their posts. [/quote]

So now it's "aggressive" to remind you people that one is [b]always[/b] innocent until proven guilty?  Why am I not surprised.[/quote]
Lock her up! Lock her up![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics